tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10195862.post7955075098162521221..comments2023-09-12T15:29:17.617+01:00Comments on The Hamlet Weblog featuring Shakespeare Blogs: Double Falsehood (The Arden Shakespeare). Edited by Brean Hammond.Stuart Ian Burnshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18132101517832896837noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10195862.post-36862586264778698992010-06-03T20:09:35.521+01:002010-06-03T20:09:35.521+01:00It's true. If Shakespeare was anywhere near s...It's true. If Shakespeare was anywhere near something it should be included even if it some later adaptation or part of a collaboration. <br /><br />I'm very surprised -- based on the analysis which is available and the current suggestions about the collaborative nature of the work at that time -- that his writing hasn't been found in a more diverse range of plays.Stuart Ian Burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18132101517832896837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10195862.post-86041476014533834612010-06-03T19:29:52.587+01:002010-06-03T19:29:52.587+01:00I am 100% for it's inclusion. As one of the f...I am 100% for it's inclusion. As one of the few remaining Stratfordians I want all of his work to be recognized. This controversy has taken a back seat lately to all this talk of Marlowe and Amelia Bassano. The reticence that one would feel including Cardenio in the canon due to the authorship question as a whole is ridiculous to me. I got into a debate about this very issue with this guy: <a href="http://www.itsasickness.com/lounge/joe-plummer-obsessed-shakespeare-controversy" rel="nofollow">Joe Plummer</a> It got a little heated and he made me feel like the only Stratfordian left.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com